Search This Site
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Review- Blood Guilty (1st Irish)
As the lights come up in Antoine O Flatharta's drama Blood Guilty, we are introduced to Pat (Vincent Dowling) and Dan (Christopher Joseph Jones), whose home life is the stuff reminiscent of the Collier Brothers and Grey Gardens. Time seems to have stopped in the cluttered house. Dan, who appears feeble-minded, but we later find is simply blind, constantly enjoys annoying his other elderly brother, Pat, by constantly switching the radio. The two older men bicker (well, Pat bickers and Dan simply listens as his bickering turns emotionally and psychologically abusive) about the radio and their life. I was actually fascinated by the relationship between the two actors...and felt such sympathy for Dan, who is at his brother's mercy, though we really don't believe that Pat will "send him to the nuthouse"...or do we?
And here is where the play ended for me. Let me start by saying that I was delighted to see beautiful work by the two older actors at the beginning of the play; their relationship was one that I bought and I felt for. It held a world of possibility for me; how did it get this way? Why was Pat such a bastard? Was Dan really so feeble or just sick of fighting? And in a theatrical world where the stage is often dominated by young actors, it was refreshing to see two seasoned older gentlemen have their day.
And bringing the two thieves/potential murderers in was an interesting ordeal, for you saw a similar dynamic between both sets of brothers - and I know that that is what the playwright and director Kevin Collins may have been going for; I know that that is what I walked away with.
However, after Pat was able to get a stab in to Tom and wound him, and John does nothing to overpower him, I just did not buy it. I didn't. There was no way, physically or psychologically (as the way John's character was set up) that he would not attack - and 98% be able to overpower Pat. One section is he strangling Dan; the next he is too hysterical to grab a small knife from a man who's obviously not his match in strength or power. Or the fact that he wouldn't just move his brother out of the house, carry him, and take him to get aid. I was completely thrown out of the play. If it came down to him not loving his brother enough and thinking of him as a burden (again, the link between the two sets of brothers), then he should have left him there and let us all go home.
What added salt to this theatrical wound...what truly ruined the play for me, was the lengthy soliloquies that Pat had as Tom was dying. As John stayed and did nothing, really, but listen to this older man rant about this and that - there were points made that would have been moving had there been some basis of reality to ground them on, since this play was established as a drama, not some stylized piece. The days of youth versus the plight of the old, of watching your dreams fade and how Pat came to where he was in life had no interest for me anymore because I no longer believed the play.
The only thing I believed...what kept me holding on...was the beautiful far away look in Dan's eye. Jones had a life going on in his character as he remained silent that was so much more intriguing for me than 98% of the show - I wanted to be where he was, in his mind. And unfortunately, we were not.
A valiant effort, but alas, potential wasted, on what could have been a good show.
-------------
The Bronx Company, Whole in the Wall & First Irish present
Blood Guilty
The Players Loft Theater
This show has now closed. For more information about the festival, visit www.firstirish.org
THe Players Loft Theater | 115 MacDougal Street, 3rd Floor | Manhattan.
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Review- Luck (1st Irish)
If you're lucky, when you get to 59E59 Theaters to see Luck you'll get to sit at one of the VIP tables up front - they've got the best view, the best table clothes and the best interaction with the star, or "hostess". But that's only if you're lucky. Then again, as Megan Riordan (playwright/performer of Luck) will tell you, "Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity"... and she will further tell you that preparation most often meets opportunity in Las Vegas. At the Blackjack Table. When you're playing on a team.
TEAM: Definition - In order to win in Blackjack - the only way - is to work in a team. And to do so successfully involves aliases, disguises, signals, codes, and escape plans. You have to be willing to take a hit for the team or the spotter can see that the card coming up will get the BP (Big Player or Big Personality) a win. You have to be willing to head to a casino straight from the airport, sit at a blackjack table with your father whom you haven't seen for a year, pretend you don't know him, and sit with him for 14 hours straigt playing cards and talking to him in code. You have to be ready for the fact that the day your dad walks you down the aisle, in fact... RIGHT before he walks you down the aisle, he offers to play you for the envelope your Uncle Jimmy just slipped you with a wink.
Ms. Riordan does a masterful job at portraying all the different angles of this life, illuminating a world that I'm sure few of us have seen, while at the same time giving us a purely stripped down one woman show about how much it can hurt to grow up in a family that is so significantly different than other families. Little tricks like using the security camera as a confessional to her dad is brilliant, the subtext being that this little eye sees all, this is the thing her father is most aware of, so by talking directly into it... maybe he will finally hear her?
Whether amped up or stripped down, Ms. Riordan is a compelling figure who found a way to tell her unique story in a fashion that does it justice. And with so many rolls of the dice and lucks of the draw that determine which scene goes next and which stories are told, the odd of it ever being the same show twice are 1:2 million and change. I'll take those odds.
Saturday, September 26, 2009
Review- The Selfish Giant (1st Irish)
Growing up can be rough; it's hard to leave behind all the wonderful, fanciful, joyous things than make up childhood and navigate the more somber realm of adulthood. But if you keep that little child inside you alive, and let them out every now and then to play, you're sure to reap the benefits of giving in to your more whimsical side.
Monday, September 21, 2009
Review- the good thief (1st Irish)
Friday, September 18, 2009
Review- Cell (1st Irish)
Upon entering the theatre we were all a bit put off at how extremely close the chairs were set up to the performance area - lined up right across from the cell's makeshift table, and next to the spartan prison beds. The more timid among us chose seats in the back row, but even then we were close enough to see the careful details of Lilia Trenkova's set design. It's very clever putting the audience, as much as possible, inside the cell, because it's uncomfortable, and scary and a bit claustrophobic. It makes you want to get away, it makes you feel exposed and devoid of privacy. You're made to feel as if you're serving your sentence right along with these women, and when that cell door slammed shut you knew which side you were on.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Review- A Short Wake (1st Irish)
Family dysfunction comes in all shapes and sizes, from all cultures. However, something can be definitely be said for the type of relationships that are cultivated in an Irish-American household that includes drinking and physical abuse. Siblings can either stick together to keep secrets or escape to other sides of the country - or the world - as they struggle to get away from their past (and each other)... although we all know that our pasts never leave us, they just have a way of sticking to us, like gum on the bottom of our shoes; or, in some cases, can be re-routed into positive outlets such as the arts.
A Short Wake, by Derek Murphy, a Dubliner, brings us into the funeral parlor for the wake of the father of Teddy (Peter Bradbury) and Jimmy (Brandon Williams). The main centerpiece of the set is a huge casket and a few chairs - perfect, really. Held in New York, the wake is a rather pitiful affair - both sons make note of the lack of anyone coming to mourn the man in the coffin and the flower arrangements looking a bit tired. Murphy's continuous hilarious dialogue allows Bradbury, even alone, to flourish as the two-bit con in a nice suit (and greasy hair), following in his bookie father's footsteps, having moments between cracking jokes to quiet his own sadness and unease as well as conflicting feelings of the final weeks of the father's cancer as he stood by his bedside. Conflicted because dear ol' dad actually thought it was the younger brother, Jimmy, the whole time, holding his hand - Jimmy, who has not been around in ten years and hates his father with a fiery passion.
As Bradbury sips from his flask and clutches his stomach from acid reflux, we see Williams finally enter, reluctantly, into the parlour. A successful lawyer in California - as far away from New York as he can get without leaving the country - Jimmy emanates a powerful wave of tension from the moment he enters the room. He can't even get past the first few chairs in the parlour, and it's Bradbury who is making all the effort to try to get a hug and pull him into the room - to try to find a common ground and a way to get past their years of dealing with abusive parents and be brothers again.
But it's not so easy. Jimmy can't understand why Teddy is even in mourning for the man that he considers to be a horrible father, human being, and abusive alcoholic; and Teddy can't understand why Jimmy can't let it go now that the man is dead - and why his younger brother's selective memory seems to have forgotten some important points about what their mother was really like as well; her alcoholism, her abusive behavior, and what really went on during one particular night that changed all of their lives forever.
And so we have a brilliantly written and acted two-character play that is really a four-character play; because the man in the coffin and the woman that we learn more about as the play goes on become as important as the two brothers on stage who, as they sip their whiskey and gin, begin to open up to each other more and more. Is this about a couple of drunk Irishmen going over old times? NO. This is a play about family, about how memories can be completely different depending on who is telling the story, and how 30-year-old grudges can become mantras for no reason other than they exist.
Bradbury had me from the beginning. From his New York bookie attitude combined with his actual pain about his father - and the hilarious monologue he has before Williams comes on, I was delightfully absorbed. When Williams first entered, and for the first fifteen minutes after his entrance, I thought the actor had some tics and was holding onto his prep to the point where it was interfering with his relating to his brother, and his ability to take in this brother he hadn't seen in 10 years (even though we know our siblings and sometimes have to only glance at them even after that long). His anger was so consuming that it almost became a fifth character in the room. But as they began to talk more, and as he accepted his brother's gift of fine whiskey in a flask, I began to see some of the prep drop, and just see a character who was in tremendous emotional pain dealing with his smart-ass brother, and vice-versa; and once he got cooking with Bradbury, then the show took off, I felt, for him and for me. Both actors should be applauded for holding this critic in the palm of their hand, simply following along as the two wove tales tall and true about their lives and loves and their relationship with each other - and the pain they were trying to get past.
Combine truly gifted actors, with fantastic direction from Ludovica Villar-Hauser and this amazing rich, darkly comedic dialogue, and you are left afterwards simply wanting to see it again. I thought the staging was great (I never saw the director's hand, and so it goes in a well-directed piece); however, one thing I would have tried was to not open the casket so that we saw the figure inside. To open it upstage would have been better, I think; for although the acting was so good that it kept my mind off of what was in that coffin, I still kept having to block it out, especially when I had a view, it took me out of the play momentarily.
It's my understanding that many, if not all, of the 21 plays in this festival are of high caliber; however, if you see any of them, please add A Short Wake to your list. Anyone who has ever had difficulty talking to a family member, and anyone who has ever wondered what it was like (are there families like that out there?) will be taken on an emotional roller-coaster, with laughter filling in the spots where it sometimes hits too close to the bone.
---------------
1st Irish 2009 and Tweiss Productions present
A Short Wake
Sept 10-26, 2009
Manhattan Theatre Source
For more information and tickets, visit www.firstirish.org.
Manhattan Theatre Source | 177 MacDougal Street | Manhattan.
Monday, September 14, 2009
Review- Tales from Rainwater Pond (1st Irish)

Tales From Rainwater Pond is written and performed by Billy Roche, a playwright and novelist whose work often centers on his hometown of Wexford, a coastal community of just under 20,000. Actually, what is presented at 1st Irish is Mr. Roche performing two short stories, “Maggie Angre” and “Haberdashery” from a book of short stories by the same name. And what stories they are.
Mr. Roche has the rare gift of richness of detail without superfluity of emotion. His brief hints at the grief of a father or the burden of a long-burning love are stunning because we are given merely a suggestion and the foundation to fill in the rest. While the stories are uniquely small-town Irish, the humor and loss they describe are universally human. There is something that happens during this show that is quite larger than its individual pieces.
Although an actor of some experience, Mr. Roche has the slow delivery and wry amusement of a writer reading his own work. At the beginning of the piece, there seems to be a firm fourth wall despite the direct address, although that breaks down by the end of the show. While Mr. Roche occasionally enacts an action in the first story and portrays the narrator of the second story, there seems to be no reason why this should be a play as well as a book. However, Mr. Roche and the production possess some ineffable magic of storytelling that makes the stories breathe in a way no reading could. The simple act of one man telling an intricate story of lonely people he cared about became a community meditation.
Review- The Pride of Parnell Street (1st Irish 2009)
It isn't always the big tragedies that can destroy a marriage, sometimes it's the small heartbreaks that can fracture a man's spirit and set off a domino effect that leaves a marriage in shambles. Welcome to Parnell Street, Dublin, where jobs are of the odd variety, entertainment comes in the form of pints of ale, love starts young and tragedy even younger. Welcome to people who find their redemption or their ruin in a game of football (or, of course, what the rest of the world calls Football... and what the Americans call Soccer).

Tragedy strikes when their oldest of three sons, little six year old Billy, is run over by a truck and killed. And here, where another family might break apart, or tear each other to pieces, laying blame or finding fault, all that happens is they mourn and move on, secure in their relationship and in their love.
Perhaps in a delayed reaction, however, when Ireland loses the World Cup to Italy that year Joe loses his mind; they all did... "When the Irish team lost, the lads suddenly knew what was what. When the Irish team were winning they could pretend they were winning, but when they lost, they knew they were losers too -- had never been winners in the first place." Joe comes home and in the early sunlight of daybreak he beats Janet, blind with a sort of rage that had never been a part of his nature before, and breaks something deep inside her... something more precious than blood vessels or bones. He breaks her trust in him. He breaks her heart.
From that moment on, Janet's life and Joe's life never connect again, though on some sub cellular level there's no breaking them apart. Even the fact that Joe is dying (something that's both obvious from his demeanor, dress and countenance, as well as something he addresses almost the minute we meet him) can not create enough of a chasm to keep their bond from stretching over the years, although even the fact that he is dying can't absolve him of his worst sin. Not in Janet's eyes. Not in his own. "I wrote a hundred times... and said a hundred times I loved her and I was sorry... but you know, a hundred letters can't wipe out a sin... but also even the worst sin can't wipe out a love..."
The story of Janet and Joe, of Parnell Street, of pride - Irish pride, family pride, too much pride to stay, too much pride to beg - is told in contrasting and sequential monologues. As Janet and Joe trade off their 20 minutes their time with the audience grows more personal, more honest, deeper, more tragic. Sunny moments are sprinkled among the sadness in rare bursts; both Janet and Joe never stop loving each other, they never stop idealizing the "good old days" but neither of them look away from what circumstances brought them to the present day.
Sebastian Barry's writing is so honest, so intimate, that there are moments when Janet could be talking to her priest, or her psychiatrist (if they had enough money to afford one). Just because they are simple people with simple ways doesn't mean their emotions are simple. Barry layers in the heart and soul of the characters in the smallest ways; Janet recalling a moment when Joe used to wheel his young son along singing Thin Lizzie songs, or when Joe talks about how patient he was when Janet was overwhelmed and frustrated when she didn't understand how to breastfeed her firstborn. It's these little glimpses, these memories, that flesh out Janet and Joe till we see them from the inside out.
Keeping the two characters apart from each other, yet always talking about each other, creates an affinity between Janet and Joe that runs deeper than if they'd spent the whole play talking directly to each other.
The Pride of Parnell Street's two stars, Mary Murray and Aidan Kelly, are so invested in their characters, and so brave in their honesty that they can take you from laughter to tears in a very short span of time. They both gave dignity and even breeding to two very regular Dubliners who probably represent a thousand others just like them. On the surface, there's nothing spectacular about either of them. And told second hand he's a petty thief who beats his wife, turns to drugs, and now lays dying, while she's a single mother of two scrubbing out rooms to keep her boys in school. Very ordinary. But scratch that surface, and sit face to face, and there is no doubt who or what the Pride of Parnell Street is.
---------------
1st Irish 2009 and fishamble present
The Pride of Parnell Street
Sept 1- Oct 4, 2009
59E59 Theaters
For tickets, schedule and more information on the 1st Irish Festival, visit www.firstirish.org
59E59 Theaters | 59 East 59th St | Manhattan.






